Well kids. It seems we have a problem on our hands, and once again the Democrat party in this country are proving themselves to be the anti-soldier, anti-military, anti-patriotism and anti-unity assholes this side of the pond. Very recently, elements of Iran's QUDS force were caught red-handed moving IED's and materials for more into Iraq. In case you're a moron, an IED is an Improvised Explosive Device. This is the weapon the vast majority of our troops are killed by. And as you would expect the Dems have run and stuck their heads in the sand, and I can tell you why - this revelation completely blows apart their carefully constructed illusion of support for the troops, and reveals a dangerous and destructive flaw in their thinking.

An American soldier who was killed by an IED

Of course the first thing all the libs brought up was the "flawed intelligence" that took us to war in Iraq. This was not because they want to make sure to get it right this time. It's merely to undercut Bush. I'm talking about a group of politicians that basically put together the intelligence Bush used to justify the war, then calls it flawed and says Bush lied to them. Now they're flailing about and gnashing their teeth because it gives the American people a true glimpse of the enemy we're fighting. But the dems refuse to acknowledge it. The only thing they can think about is stopping Bush from "starting another war". It seems to me Iran is trying to get in on this one by supplying the weapons and training necessary for the insurgency to kill the troops they claim to support. But of course, supporting the troops stops when it comes to implementing their lame and misguided policies. Actually supporting the troops would mean doing away with the Iraq Surrender Group's idea to get Iran involved in a "peace" process.

The Iraq Surrender Group, better known as The Political Opportunists

Last time I checked, killing American soldiers was an act of war. Of course, the Democrat way out of this situation is to give Iran's government the benefit of the doubt. WTF? Anyone remember Abu Ghraib? Posing with corpses, panties on the head, naked pyramids - this was the worst treatment in the world a prisoner could receive, right?

America's favorite G.I. Jane, Lindy Englund

Wow, that's disturbing. But never mind how the enemy treated our prisoners. They received much better treatment, didn't they?

Here's Nick Berg's head after his captors decapitated him...

...and here's the rest of his body that was left hanging to show the world how much fairer our enemies are than us.

And of course the panties on the head orders had to come from Bush, right? Rumsfeld had to be involved, right? Bush had to be impeached! We have to show the world community that we aren't savages who approve of siccing dogs on those who have vital information to save our troops, or putting detainees in naked pyramids to demoralize them in the hopes of thwarting attacks on our soldiers and saving American lives. Heaven forbid! And who remembers "Plame-Gate"? Bush had to have ordered her name be released! Cheney and Karl Rove conspired to put this woman in deadly danger in order to discredit her husband, who had found evidence proving Bush lied about the yellow-cake uranium. Never mind that Plame had not been undercover since the Reagan administration, so no crime was committed. Or that her husband, one Joe Wilson, is a political activist who was only sent to Iraq after his wife pulled some strings with the intended purpose of discrediting the war effort. Let's put aside the fact he admitted to the grand jury in the Libby case he lied about his findings in Iraq, and Saddam had indeed tried to purchase the uranium in question from Niger. While we're at it, let's gloss over the fact that former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage admitted doing it in the context of a casual conversation. It had to be Bush. Impeach Bush! These things always go to the top!

More morons and pussies than you can shake a stick at.

So why aren't these same arguments being made about the Iran situation? Why does the Democrat party, which is now in control of Congress, not hold Iran's government to the same standards as our own? How is it the Bush administration can be personally responsible for the actions of every single misguided individual possibly having anything to do with the war effort (and even a hurricane), and the Iranian government is not? How can we still be talking about Iran as a party to peace? The QUDS force is an arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Force that not only put the government in place, but answers directly to it! Does anyone remember the last time a peace settlement was negotiated with a known enemy and fascist?

Neville Chamberlain shaking hands with Adolf Hitler after inventing the modern "land for peace" strategy. That worked out well, didn't it?

I know what you're thinking - they're just doing everything they can to find peace, and searching for all diplomatic options. Or maybe they're just pussies. I'm sorry, but it goes far beyond that. It's all about political power. Every soldier in harm's way is merely a tool to get what they want. They hide their efforts to lose this war behind the front of "supporting the troops", but the only time a soldier is useful to them is when they can harp about the death count going up. Threatening to remove funding is not supporting the troops. Passing a resolution that accomplishes nothing besides providing propaganda for our enemies and demoralizing our military is not supporting the troops. Pulling our fighting men and women out before the mission is finished and leaving our enemies to gather strength is not supporting the troops. Constantly telling our soldiers they can't win when they feel they can is not supporting the troops. They are totally committed to the defeat of this country if it will gain them political power.

The sad truth is the only enemy they care about is George W. Bush and anyone who agrees with him. Iran can kill all the soldiers they want.